I WANT TO GET INTO THENITTY-GRITTY OF THE ARTICLES AGAINST BERNIE SANDERS JUST TOEXPLAIN FURTHER TO THE ESTABLISHMENT PRESS WHY WE CALLTHEM THE ESTABLISHMENT PRESS, BECAUSE THEY LITERALLY CAN'T SEEIT. SO WE WANT TO HELP THEM OUT AS A PUBLIC SERVICEANNOUNCEMENT, SO THE BOSTON GLOBE ARTICLE THAT SAYS BERNIESANDERS NEEDS TO FALL IN LINE, HE CALLS THE SANDERS CAMPAIGN,ITS CURRENT STATE OF SELF-PARODY. AND THIS WASWRITTEN BEFORE LAST NIGHT, IT WAS BEFORE THE ELECTIONS, BEFOREBERNIE SANDERS REFUSED TO GET OUT AFTER THE LAST SET OFVOTING. CURRENT STATE OF SELF-PARODY? THE GUY RAN A TOUGHCAMPAIGN AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON -- WHAT PART OF THAT WASSELF-PARODY?>>THAT ARTICLE IS THE SELF-PARODY. >>BECAUSE YOU CAN'T STAND HIM, YOU ASSUME THAT, CAN'T EVERYBODYSEE HOW LOATHSOME THIS GUY IS? I CAN'T STAND HIM. AND HE SAYS, HEHAS POTENTIAL TO DO REAL DAMAGE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. OKAY,THAT IS AN OPINION TO HAVE, BUT IT IS A WAY OF SAYING GET OUT,GET OUT, YOU ARE INTOLERABLE. WHAT MUST BE PROTECTED IS THEDEMOCRATIC PARTY. AND HE SAYS, HE IS LACERATING CLINTON WITHTHE KIND OF PERSONAL ATTACKS HE ONCE SAID HE WOULD NEVER LODGEDAGAINST HER. LACERATING CLINTON?>>THEY ATTACKED HIM FOR NOT TALKING ABOUT HER DURINGHIS LAST SPEECH. WHICH IS IT?>>I ASKED HIM WHEN HE WAS ON THE SHOW, WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY THEBANKRUPTCY BILL WHEN ASKED WHAT POSITION SHE HAS CHANGED ON? HESAID I'M NOT RUNNING THE KIND OF CAMPAIGN. I SAID WHY DON'T YOUTALK ABOUT THE INDICTMENT POSSIBLE AGAINST HER? HE SAIDI'M NOT RUNNING THE CAMPAIGN. HE REFUSED THE MOST OBVIOUS LINESOF ATTACK. ON THE OTHER HAND, WE SAW WHAT REAL PERSONAL ATTACKSWERE THE MINUTE TRUMP TURNED HIS ATTENTION TO HILLARY. MONICALEWINSKY, ETC. BERNIE SANDERS WAS NOT WITHIN MILES. HIS MAINCONCERN OF HER WAS SHE'S PART OF THE CORRUPT SYSTEM WHERE YOUTAKE DOLLARS AND THEN YOU DO WHAT THE MILLIONAIRES TOLD YOUTO DO. THAT IS NOT LACERATING HER PERSONALLY, IT'S MORE OF ACRITICISM OF THE SYSTEM THAN OF HILLARY CLINTON. IF YOU CAN'TSAY THAT, WHY ARE YOU RUNNING THE CAMPAIGN? WHAT IS HESUPPOSED TO DO? THERE IS A PROBLEM IN THE COUNTRY BUT ICAN'T TELL YOU WHAT IT IS BECAUSE IT MIGHT SEEM PERSONALAGAINST HILLARY CLINTON? THAT IS PREPOSTEROUS. THEN WE GO TO THENEW YORK TIMES, HILLARY MADE HISTORY BUT BERNIE STUBBORNLYIGNORED IT. IN THAT ARTICLE THEY SAY THAT WHEN HE SAYS OUR VISIONWILL BE THE FUTURE OF AMERICA -- OKAY, THAT IS ALMOST A STANDARDPOLITICAL LINE, I DON'T WANT TO GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR THAT, MOSTEVERY POLITICIAN DOES THAT. BILL CLINTON AND AL GORE SAID IT WHENTHEY SAID THEY WILL BUILD A BRIDGE TO THE 21ST CENTURY. PEOPLE NORMALLY GO, THAT IS GREAT, OUR VISION WILL BE THEFUTURE OF AMERICA, AND NO ONE CAN MAKE THAT ARGUMENT BETTERTHAN BERNIE BECAUSE HE HAS AN OVERWHELMINGLY HIGH PERCENTAGEOF THE YOUNG VOTE, THE FUTURE OF AMERICA. THEY CALLED ITMESSIANIC. LIKE, YOU THINK YOU ARE A MESSIAH, BECAUSE YOURVISION OF THE FUTURE IS -- EVERY POLITICIAN TALKS ABOUTTHEIR VISION OF THE FUTURE, WHEN IT IS AN ESTABLISHMENTPOLITICIAN YOU APPLAUD WILDLY. BUT WHEN IT IS BERNIE SANDERS,MESSIANIC? DO YOU SEE WHAT WE ARE SAYING ABOUT YOUR BIAS THATYOU ARE NOT EVEN AWARE OF? YOU TAKE SOMETHING THAT IS BENIGN ORNEUTRAL AND YOU TWIST IT AGAINST HIM, AND THEN YOU SAY, WHATBIAS? WE ARE PERFECTLY FAIR. THAT IS THE NEW YORK TIMES. MORE, THEY SAY THERE WAS ANGER AT MRS. CLINTON AND THEASSESSMENT SHE EXEMPLIFIES, AND IN HIS RALLY LAST NIGHT INSANTA MONICA IT WAS VISCERAL AND ABUNDANT. YES, THERE IS ANGER ATTHE SYSTEM BUT YOU ARE PAINTING IT LIKE IT IS ANGER AT HERPERSONALLY. NO, IT IS ANGER THAT THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT,THAT IT IS AWASH IN PRIVATE INTERESTS, THE MILLIONS OFDOLLARS THAT THEN LEAD TO EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT INSTEADOF WHAT THE VOTERS WANT. WE SHOULD BE ANGRY ABOUT THAT. ANDAGAIN, THAT GOES TO THE HEART OF YOUR BIAS THAT YOU DON'T REALIZE-- IF YOU THINK WE SHOULD NOT BE ANGRY ABOUT THAT CORRUPTION,THAT WE SHOULD JUST TAKE IT LYING DOWN, LIKE, I'M CALM, ALLMY REPRESENTATIVES NOW DON'T REPRESENT ME, THEY REPRESENTTHEIR DONORS. PRINCETON, NORTHWESTERN, EVERYONE HASPROVEN THAT OUT FOR DECADE AFTER DECADE, BUT I SHOULD BE CALMABOUT IT. YOU CAN HAVE FUN WITH YOUR CUTE LITTLE REVOLUTION BUTDON'T BE ANGRY ABOUT IT. A REVOLUTION SHOULD BE WITHTEACUPS AND SCONES AND SHOULD BE CALM AND POLITE, AND DONE WITHKERCHIEFS. IT'S NOT ENOUGH THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT TREMBLES YOU,YOU NEED TO LAY DOWN AND PUT YOUR HEAD UNDER THEIR BOOTS. >>YOU NEED TO KNOW HOW TO TAKE IT. AND THAT WILL BE OUR LASTQUOTE, FROM HOWARD DEAN. WE WILL NOT TAKE IT. THAT DOESN'T MEANPHYSICAL -- THESE TOTALLY MADE UP CHARGES OF VIOLENCE FROM THEMOST LIBERAL, MOST NONVIOLENT SENATOR IN U. S. HISTORY, ATLEAST IN MY LIFETIME, I SHOULD BE CLEAR. YOU'VE GOT ALL THAT. BUT WE WILL BE LOUD, AND IF THAT ANNOYS YOU, SORRY. AND THEN WEGO TO ANOTHER ARTICLE FROM THE GUARDIAN. EVEN THE GUARDIAN. THEY SAY, AND YOU CAN TELL THIS WHOLE ARTICLE WAS DERISIVE INEVERY WAY, HE SAYS, NEAR THE END, SANDERS HAS FOUGHT AREMARKABLE AND INSPIRING CAMPAIGN -- THAT'S NOT HOW YOUPAINTED IT EARLIER, EARLIER YOU TALKED ABOUT HOW IT'S USELESSAND FUTILE AND WHY IS HE DOING IT, WHAT IS THE POINT, NOW THATTHEY WANT HIM TO DROP OUT, A PAT ON THE HEAD. YOU'VE BEENREMARKABLE AND INSPIRING, NOW RUN ALONG. THE VERY NEXTSENTENCE IS, HE NOW RISKS TAINTING IT. >>WE WOULDN'T WANT IT TAINTED. >>LIGHT, BE A GOOD BOY AND RUN ALONG. YOU HAD FUN WITH YOURINSPIRING CAMPAIGN, BUT WE WILL PUNISH YOU IF YOU KEEP GOING,AND WE WILL RUIN YOUR REPUTATION. FINALLY, WE GET TOHOWARD DEAN'S QUOTE IN YET ANOTHER MAINSTREAM OUTLET, ANDTHEY TALKED TO HIM ABOUT, HOWARD, YOU KNEW WHEN TO BE AGOOD BOY. IN 2000 FOR YOU KNEW WHEN YOU WERE BEATEN. AND HEGIVES PLENTIFUL QUOTES ABOUT THAT NOW THAT HE IS A LOBBYIST. YES, YOU SHOULD KNOW WHEN YOU ARE BEATEN. AND THE FINAL QUOTEIS, YOU DON'T GET ANY POINTS FOR CARRYING ON OR COMPLAINING ABOUTTHAT YOU LOST, YOU GET POINTS FOR SUCKING IT UP. >>THAT IS TRUE. >>THAT IS EXACTLY RIGHT. YOU DON'T GET POINTS. HOWARD, YOUGET DOLLARS. I GET IT, WHEN YOU SUCKED IT UP YOU WOUND UP BEINGA HIGH PAID LOBBYIST AND RESPECTED COMMENTATOR ONTELEVISION, BECAUSE YOU FELL IN LINE AND YOU SUCKED IT UP. WHENBERNIE SANDERS DOESN'T DO THAT, HE EMBARRASSES THE REST OF YOU,BECAUSE IT TURNS OUT YOU COULD HAVE HAD PRINCIPLES, AND YOUCOULD HAVE STUCK TO THEM. BUT SINCE YOU DIDN'T, SANDERS GRATESON YOUR EVERY NERVE. WHY DOES HE CONTINUE TO CARRY ON ABOUTTRYING TO FIX THIS SYSTEM? WHY DOESN'T HE FALL IN LINE AND SUCKIT UP? WELL, IF THAT BOTHERS YOU, YOU MIGHT BE IN THEESTABLISHMENT.
No comments :
Post a Comment